Comments
chuck woodward 06 Jun : 01:09 Reply to this | This looks promising. I'll try this on some plans I'm considering. |
GrandpaCoyote
17 Jun : 23:28 Reply to this | Joe, thank you for putting this out in the world it has been a great help to me in my plans and it is much easier to follow than Mr. Dohn's equations were. |
joef
31 Aug : 18:51 Reply to this | Grandpa:
Glad you find the formulas useful. Roy Dohn's formulas are a great start, but enough progress has been made in the art of track planning since the article appeared in the 1960s MR that a serious update was needed -- hence my article. |
joef
31 Aug : 18:54 Reply to this | Q: WHAT ABOUT A DESIGN WITH A DOUBLE TRACK MAINLINE?
The question of how to analyze a double track main layout design comes up a lot. Treat one main as mainline, and the other as alternating between connecting track and passing sidings, as you prefer.
The end result will be a double tracked layout can move a lot of cars -- which is just what you would expect.
However, be aware much of the fun of dispatching is arranging meets and figuring out how to get one train past another. A double track mainline will be less of a challenge to dispatch since few trains will need to pass each other unless there are a lot of locals blocking the main.
Such a layout will move lots of trains, so you'd better have lots of staging on each end to supply the double track with trains -- and you'd better have operators who love just rolling off the miles on the main. Many find single track railroads are more interesting operationally -- just something to be aware of. |
dfandrews
23 Sep : 15:52 Reply to this | This had been a tremendous aid in understanding the frailties of my design. It's not a "two scoops, add water" instant design method, but it does provide great insight into the functions of the layout. Thanks so much. I'll be including an LDA summary when I update my blog on MRH. Don |
Email news_item to a friend here to signup | Search Joe Fugate's Siskiyou Line |